|
CATEGORY |
Exemplary (5 points) |
Proficient (3 points) |
Developing (1 point) |
|
Arrangement of Concepts |
Main concept easily identified; subconcepts
branch appropriately from main idea. |
Main concept easily identified; most subconcepts
branch from main idea. |
Main concept not clearly identified; subconcepts
don’t consistently branch from main idea.
|
|
Logic |
Understanding of facts and concepts is clearly
demonstrated by correct links and action verbs.
|
Understand of facts and concepts is demonstrated
but with some errors (e.g. incorrect links and
verbs). |
Poor understanding of facts or concepts with
significant errors. |
|
Links |
Linking lines connect related terms/point in
correct direction with arrow; linking words
accurately describe relationship between
concepts. Links can be read individually
(not as part of a chain). |
Most linking lines connect properly; most
linking words accurately describe the
relationship between concepts. |
Linking lines not always pointing in correct
direction; linking words are absent or don’t
clarify relationships between concepts. |
|
Content |
All relevant concepts and mechanisms are
included (map includes all unit key terms) |
Most relevant concepts and mechanisms are
included. |
Few relevant concepts and mechanisms are
included. |
|
Presentation
|
Concept map has an appropriate title. Map is
neat, clear, legible, and has easy to follow
links. Has no spelling or grammatical errors.
Appears to be final draft quality. |
Concept map has an appropriate title. Concept
map is neat, clear, legible, and has easy to
follow links. Has some spelling or grammatical
errors or appears to be draft quality. |
Concept map has an inappropriate title or is
untidy or has difficult to follow links or has
many spelling or grammatical errors or appears
to be draft quality. |